↓ Skip to main content

Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe
Published in
Diabetologia, May 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00125-002-0858-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Jönsson

Abstract

'The Cost of Diabetes in Europe - Type II study' is the first coordinated attempt to measure total healthcare costs of Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Europe. The study evaluated more than 7000 patients with Type II diabetes in eight countries -- Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. A bottom-up, prevalence-based design was used, which optimised the collection of data at the national level while maintaining maximum international comparability. Effort was made to ensure consistency in terms of data specification, data collection tools and methods, sampling design, and the analysis and reporting of results. Results are reported for individual countries and in aggregate for the total study population. The total direct medical costs of Type II diabetes in the eight European countries was estimated at EUR 29 billion a year (1999 values). The estimated average yearly cost per patient was EUR 2834 a year. Of these costs, hospitalisations accounted for the greatest proportion (55%, range 30-65%) totalling EUR 15.9 billion for the eight countries. During the 6-month evaluation period, 13% of the Type II diabetic patients were hospitalised, with an average of 23 days in hospital projected annually. In contrast, drug costs for managing Type II diabetes were relatively low, with antidiabetic drugs and insulin accounting for only 7% of the total healthcare costs for Type II diabetes. Type II diabetes mellitus is a common disease and the prevalence is expected to increase considerably in the future, especially in developing countries. Current comprehensive economic data on the costs of diabetes are required for policy decisions to optimise resource allocation and to evaluate different approaches for disease management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Ireland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 268 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 19 7%
Other 51 18%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 52 18%
Unknown 68 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,841,018
of 23,779,713 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,956
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,572
of 122,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,779,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.