↓ Skip to main content

Empowerment, Deliberative Development, and Local-Level Politics in Indonesia: Participatory Projects as a Source of Countervailing Power

Overview of attention for article published in Studies in Comparative International Development, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Empowerment, Deliberative Development, and Local-Level Politics in Indonesia: Participatory Projects as a Source of Countervailing Power
Published in
Studies in Comparative International Development, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12116-008-9021-0
Authors

Christopher Gibson, Michael Woolcock

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 28%
Lecturer 16 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 68 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 6%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 25 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2009.
All research outputs
#7,801,448
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#154
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,226
of 79,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them