| Title |
The new randomised controlled trials (RCT) movement in public policy: challenges of epistemic governance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Sciences, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11077-014-9208-3 |
| Authors |
Warren Pearce, Sujatha Raman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 18% |
| Canada | 6 | 12% |
| Japan | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| Comoros | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 43% |
| Scientists | 14 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 35 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 69 | 39% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 8% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,160,521
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#25
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,967
of 277,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them