↓ Skip to main content

Isolated Severe Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Acute Brucellosis

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Isolated Severe Immune Thrombocytopenia due to Acute Brucellosis
Published in
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12288-012-0222-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ozlem Guzel Tunccan, Murat Dizbay, Esin Senol, Zeynep Aki, Kevser Ozdemir

Abstract

Mild anemia and leukopenia are the most common hematologic findings in the course of acute brucellosis. However severe form of thrombocytopenia is less frequently reported. The patient was admitted to the hospital with fever, gingival bleeding, and petechial skin lesions related to severe thrombocytopenia. He was investigated for the causes of thrombocytopenia. Test results showed that Wright agglutination test was positive at 1/5120 titer, and blood culture was positive for Brucella melitensis. Finally, he was diagnosed as acute brucellosis. Rifampicin and doxycycline treatment was started on he third day of admission. A bone marrow aspiration was performed on the seventh day of admission because of severe thrombocytopenia did not response to brucellosis treatment. The result of bone marrow aspiration was consistent with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. With the addition of corticosteroid treatment, his complaints resolved immediately, and thrombocyte count rose to normal range. He was discharged on the 12th day of rifampicin and doxycycline therapy, and he was successfully completed 6-week therapy. In cases of brucella induced immune thrombocytopenia, corticosteroid treatment might be useful for the prevention of bleeding complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 11%
Kenya 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,810,041
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#237
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,884
of 289,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.