↓ Skip to main content

Implications of Timing of Maternal Depressive Symptoms for Early Cognitive and Language Development

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
347 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
489 Mendeley
Title
Implications of Timing of Maternal Depressive Symptoms for Early Cognitive and Language Development
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10567-006-0004-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara L. Sohr-Preston, Laura V. Scaramella

Abstract

: Statistically, women, particularly pregnant women and new mothers, are at heightened risk for depression. The present review describes the current state of the research linking maternal depressed mood and children's cognitive and language development. Exposure to maternal depressive symptoms, whether during the prenatal period, postpartum period, or chronically, has been found to increase children's risk for later cognitive and language difficulties. The present review considers both the timing of maternal depression and the chronicity of mothers' depression on children's risk for cognitive and language delays. Infancy is frequently identified as a sensitive period in which environmental stimulation has the potential to substantially influence children's cognitive and language development. However, children's exposure to chronic maternal depression seems to be associated with more problematic outcomes for children, perhaps because depression interferes with mothers' ability to respond sensitively and consistently over time. Consistent with this expectation, interventions targeting parenting practices of depressed mothers have been found to increase children's cognitive competence during early childhood. The current review provides a synthesis of the current state of the field regarding the association between maternal depression and children's cognitive and language development during early childhood.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 489 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 478 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 18%
Student > Master 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 61 12%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 97 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 162 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 83 17%
Social Sciences 44 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Other 45 9%
Unknown 119 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,788,003
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#117
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,727
of 78,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them