| Title |
Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marjolein H Gysels, Catherine Evans, Irene J Higginson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 45% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 66% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 22% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 13% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,074,016
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#279
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,023
of 191,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.