| Title |
Comparing Diagnostic Outcomes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-014-2306-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth B. Harstad, Jason Fogler, Georgios Sideridis, Sarah Weas, Carrie Mauras, William J. Barbaresi |
| Abstract |
Controversy exists regarding the DSM-5 criteria for ASD. This study tested the psychometric properties of the DSM-5 model and determined how well it performed across different gender, IQ, and DSM-IV-TR sub-type, using clinically collected data on 227 subjects (median age = 3.95 years, majority had IQ > 70). DSM-5 was psychometrically superior to the DSM-IV-TR model (Comparative Fit Index of 0.970 vs 0.879, respectively). Measurement invariance revealed good model fit across gender and IQ. Younger children tended to meet fewer diagnostic criteria. Those with autistic disorder were more likely to meet social communication and repetitive behaviors criteria (p < .001) than those with PDD-NOS. DSM-5 is a robust model but will identify a different, albeit overlapping population of individuals compared to DSM-IV-TR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 9% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Jordan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,179,415
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#924
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,449
of 271,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#17
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.