↓ Skip to main content

Optimal Devaluations

Overview of attention for article published in IMF Economic Review, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Optimal Devaluations
Published in
IMF Economic Review, April 2013
DOI 10.1057/imfer.2013.2
Authors

Constantino Hevia, Juan Pablo Nicolini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 52%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 62%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,310,081
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from IMF Economic Review
#177
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,042
of 199,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMF Economic Review
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.