You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ESTIMATING INCOME INEQUALITY IN CHINA USING GROUPED DATA AND THE GENERALIZED BETA DISTRIBUTION
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Income & Wealth, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1475-4991.2007.00220.x |
| Authors |
Duangkamon Chotikapanich, D. S. Prasada Rao, Kam Ki Tang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Energy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Review of Income & Wealth
#243
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,545
of 90,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Income & Wealth
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.