↓ Skip to main content

The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of long-term macrolide treatment on respiratory microbiota composition in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: an analysis from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled BLESS trial
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70213-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geraint B Rogers, Kenneth D Bruce, Megan L Martin, Lucy D Burr, David J Serisier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,706,526
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#1,289
of 2,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,190
of 268,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#12
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 78.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.