↓ Skip to main content

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Total, Abdominal and Visceral Fat Mass: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 2,898)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
240 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
648 Mendeley
Title
Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Total, Abdominal and Visceral Fat Mass: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0807-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florie Maillard, Bruno Pereira, Nathalie Boisseau

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is promoted as a time-efficient strategy to improve body composition. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of HIIT in reducing total, abdominal, and visceral fat mass in normal-weight and overweight/obese adults. Electronic databases were searched to identify all related articles on HIIT and fat mass. Stratified analysis was performed using the nature of HIIT (cycling versus running, target intensity), sex and/or body weight, and the methods of measuring body composition. Heterogeneity was also determined RESULTS: A total of 39 studies involving 617 subjects were included (mean age 38.8 years ± 14.4, 52% females). HIIT significantly reduced total (p = 0.003), abdominal (p = 0.007), and visceral (p = 0.018) fat mass, with no differences between the sexes. A comparison showed that running was more effective than cycling in reducing total and visceral fat mass. High-intensity (above 90% peak heart rate) training was more successful in reducing whole body adiposity, while lower intensities had a greater effect on changes in abdominal and visceral fat mass. Our analysis also indicated that only computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging showed significant abdominal and/or visceral fat-mass loss after HIIT interventions. HIIT is a time-efficient strategy to decrease fat-mass deposits, including those of abdominal and visceral fat mass. There was some evidence of the greater effectiveness of HIIT running versus cycling, but owing to the wide variety of protocols used and the lack of full details about cycling training, further comparisons need to be made. Large, multicenter, prospective studies are required to establish the best HIIT protocols for reducing fat mass according to subject characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 240 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 648 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 648 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 98 15%
Student > Master 88 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 9%
Researcher 42 6%
Other 31 5%
Other 114 18%
Unknown 215 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 188 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 3%
Unspecified 15 2%
Other 48 7%
Unknown 250 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 642. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#34,693
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#22
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#670
of 340,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.