↓ Skip to main content

Cis–trans interactions of cell surface receptors: biological roles and structural basis

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Cis–trans interactions of cell surface receptors: biological roles and structural basis
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00018-011-0798-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Held, Roy A. Mariuzza

Abstract

Cell surface receptors bind ligands expressed on other cells (in trans) in order to communicate with neighboring cells. However, an increasing number of cell surface receptors are found to also interact with ligands expressed on the same cell (in cis). These observations raise questions regarding the biological role of such cis interactions. Specifically, it is important to know whether cis and trans binding have distinct functional effects and, if so, how a single cell discriminates between interactions in cis versus trans. Further, what are the structural features that allow certain cell surface receptors to engage ligand both on the same as well as on an apposed cell membrane? Here, we summarize known examples of receptors that display cis-trans binding and discuss the emerging diversity of biological roles played by these unconventional two-way interactions, along with their structural basis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 40%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Chemistry 7 9%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 8%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,237,529
of 24,978,429 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,605
of 5,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,837
of 128,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,978,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.