| Title |
Modelling China’s potential maize production at regional scale under climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climatic Change, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10584-007-9284-x |
| Authors |
Wei Xiong, Robin Matthews, Ian Holman, Erda Lin, Yinglong Xu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#3,968,576
of 23,680,154 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#2,635
of 5,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,097
of 68,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,680,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.