↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations for International Gambling Harm-Minimisation Guidelines: Comparison with Effective Public Health Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations for International Gambling Harm-Minimisation Guidelines: Comparison with Effective Public Health Policy
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10899-013-9389-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally M. Gainsbury, Matthijs Blankers, Claire Wilkinson, Karen Schelleman-Offermans, Janna Cousijn

Abstract

Problem gambling represents a significant public health problem, however, research on effective gambling harm-minimisation measures lags behind other fields, including other addictive disorders. In recognition of the need for consistency between international jurisdictions and the importance of basing policy on empirical evidence, international conventions exist for policy on alcohol, tobacco, and illegal substances. This paper examines the evidence of best practice policies to provide recommendations for international guidelines for harm-minimisation policy for gambling, including specific consideration of the specific requirements for policies on Internet gambling. Evidence indicates that many of the public health policies implemented for addictive substances can be adapted to address gambling-related harms. Specifically, a minimum legal age of at least 18 for gambling participation, licensing of gambling venues and activities with responsible gambling and consumer protection strategies mandated, and brief interventions should be available for those at-risk for and experiencing gambling-related problems. However, there is mixed evidence on the effectiveness of limits on opening hours and gambling venue density and increased taxation to minimise harms. Given increases in trade globalisation and particularly the global nature of Internet gambling, it is recommended that jurisdictions take actions to harmonise gambling public health policies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 19%
Social Sciences 29 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2017.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#272
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,510
of 213,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.