↓ Skip to main content

Adapting to climate change: an integrated biophysical and economic assessment for Mozambique

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Adapting to climate change: an integrated biophysical and economic assessment for Mozambique
Published in
Sustainability Science, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0118-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Channing Arndt, Kenneth Strzepeck, Finn Tarp, James Thurlow, Charles Fant, Len Wright

Abstract

Mozambique, like many African countries, is already highly susceptible to climate variability and extreme weather events. Climate change threatens to heighten this vulnerability. In order to evaluate potential impacts and adaptation options for Mozambique, we develop an integrated modeling framework that translates atmospheric changes from general circulation model projections into biophysical outcomes via detailed hydrologic, crop, hydropower and infrastructure models. These sector models simulate a historical baseline and four extreme climate change scenarios. Sector results are then passed down to a dynamic computable general equilibrium model, which is used to estimate economy-wide impacts on national welfare, as well as the total cost of damages caused by climate change. Potential damages without changes in policy are significant; our discounted estimates range from US$ 2.3 to US $7.4 billion during 2003-2050. Our analysis identifies improved road design and agricultural sector investments as key 'no-regret' adaptation measures, alongside intensified efforts to develop a more flexible and resilient society. Our findings also support the need for cooperative river basin management and the regional coordination of adaptation strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 169 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21 12%
Engineering 14 8%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,943,974
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#494
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,603
of 180,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them