↓ Skip to main content

Transethnic insight into the genetics of glycaemic traits: fine-mapping results from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Transethnic insight into the genetics of glycaemic traits: fine-mapping results from the Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) consortium
Published in
Diabetologia, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00125-017-4405-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie A. Bien, James S. Pankow, Jeffrey Haessler, Yinchang N. Lu, Nathan Pankratz, Rebecca R. Rohde, Alfred Tamuno, Christopher S. Carlson, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Petra Bůžková, Martha L. Daviglus, Unhee Lim, Myriam Fornage, Lindsay Fernandez-Rhodes, Larissa Avilés-Santa, Steven Buyske, Myron D. Gross, Mariaelisa Graff, Carmen R. Isasi, Lewis H. Kuller, JoAnn E. Manson, Tara C. Matise, Ross L. Prentice, Lynne R. Wilkens, Sachiko Yoneyama, Ruth J. F. Loos, Lucia A. Hindorff, Loic Le Marchand, Kari E. North, Christopher A. Haiman, Ulrike Peters, Charles Kooperberg

Abstract

Elevated levels of fasting glucose and fasting insulin in non-diabetic individuals are markers of dysregulation of glucose metabolism and are strong risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Genome-wide association studies have discovered over 50 SNPs associated with these traits. Most of these loci were discovered in European populations and have not been tested in a well-powered multi-ethnic study. We hypothesised that a large, ancestrally diverse, fine-mapping genetic study of glycaemic traits would identify novel and population-specific associations that were previously undetectable by European-centric studies. A multiethnic study of up to 26,760 unrelated individuals without diabetes, of predominantly Hispanic/Latino and African ancestries, were genotyped using the Metabochip. Transethnic meta-analysis of racial/ethnic-specific linear regression analyses were performed for fasting glucose and fasting insulin. We attempted to replicate 39 fasting glucose and 17 fasting insulin loci. Genetic fine-mapping was performed through sequential conditional analyses in 15 regions that included both the initially reported SNP association(s) and denser coverage of SNP markers. In addition, Metabochip-wide analyses were performed to discover novel fasting glucose and fasting insulin loci. The most significant SNP associations were further examined using bioinformatic functional annotation. Previously reported SNP associations were significantly replicated (p ≤ 0.05) in 31/39 fasting glucose loci and 14/17 fasting insulin loci. Eleven glycaemic trait loci were refined to a smaller list of potentially causal variants through transethnic meta-analysis. Stepwise conditional analysis identified two loci with independent secondary signals (G6PC2-rs477224 and GCK-rs2908290), which had not previously been reported. Population-specific conditional analyses identified an independent signal in G6PC2 tagged by the rare variant rs77719485 in African ancestry. Further Metabochip-wide analysis uncovered one novel fasting insulin locus at SLC17A2-rs75862513. These findings suggest that while glycaemic trait loci often have generalisable effects across the studied populations, transethnic genetic studies help to prioritise likely functional SNPs, identify novel associations that may be population-specific and in turn have the potential to influence screening efforts or therapeutic discoveries. The summary statistics from each of the ancestry-specific and transethnic (combined ancestry) results can be found under the PAGE study on dbGaP here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?study_id=phs000356.v1.p1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Master 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,765,813
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#1,740
of 5,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,475
of 316,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#72
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.