| Title |
The Results of the “Positive Action for Today's Health” (PATH) Trial for Increasing Walking and Physical Activity in Underserved African-American Communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-014-9664-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn K. Wilson, M. Lee Van Horn, E. Rebekah Siceloff, Kassandra A. Alia, Sara M. St. George, Hannah G. Lawman, Nevelyn N. Trumpeter, Sandra M. Coulon, Sarah F. Griffin, Abraham Wandersman, Brent Egan, Natalie Colabianchi, Melinda Forthofer, Barney Gadson |
| Abstract |
The "Positive Action for Today's Health" (PATH) trial tested an environmental intervention to increase walking in underserved communities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 126 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 24 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Psychology | 13 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,965,098
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#394
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,275
of 258,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.