You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patterns and correlates of giant sequoia foliage dieback during California’s 2012–2016 hotter drought
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Ecology & Management, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.10.053 |
| Authors |
Nathan L. Stephenson, Adrian J. Das, Nicholas J. Ampersee, Kathleen G. Cahill, Anthony C. Caprio, John E. Sanders, A. Park Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#375,804
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Forest Ecology & Management
#44
of 5,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,219
of 341,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Ecology & Management
#1
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.