↓ Skip to main content

Current developments in early diagnosis of acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Current developments in early diagnosis of acute kidney injury
Published in
Geriatric Nephrology and Urology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11255-013-0448-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Obermüller, Helmut Geiger, Christine Weipert, Anja Urbschat

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a very frequent and serious clinical problem, accounting for overall high morbidity and mortality. Up to date, mortality due to AKI is virtually unchanged over the past 50 years. This may partly be explained due to a delay in initiating renal protective and appropriate therapeutic measures since until now there are no reliable early-detecting biomarkers. The gold standard, serum creatinine, displays poor specificity and sensitivity with regard to identification of the incipient phase of AKI, and this is also true for cystatin C. We aimed to review novel biomarkers of AKI in urine and serum which have now progressed to the clinical phase. The main focus refers to their diagnostic and prognostic value. For this purpose, a web-based literature search using PubMed was performed comprising the following terms: renal failure, acute kidney injury and biomarkers. New molecules such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), monocyte chemotactic peptide (MCP-1), Il-18, liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) and Netrin-1 are available and represent promising new markers that, however, need to be further evaluated in the clinical setting for suitability. In clinical settings with incipient AKI, not only the development and the implementation of more sensitive, practicable and accurate biomarkers are required for well-timed treatment initiation. Just as important is a substantial improvement of refined and applicable prophylactic therapeutic options in these situations. Before full adoption in clinical practice can be accomplished, adequately powered clinical trials testing a row of biomarkers are strongly warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#1,233
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,675
of 207,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geriatric Nephrology and Urology
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.