You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The next generation of rodent eradications: Innovative technologies and tools to improve species specificity and increase their feasibility on islands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.016 |
| Authors |
Karl J. Campbell, Joe Beek, Charles T. Eason, Alistair S. Glen, John Godwin, Fred Gould, Nick D. Holmes, Gregg R. Howald, Francine M. Madden, Julia B. Ponder, David W. Threadgill, Alexander S. Wegmann, Greg S. Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 259 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 339. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2022.
All research outputs
#96,888
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#54
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#937
of 278,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.