↓ Skip to main content

Popular Weight Loss Strategies: a Review of Four Weight Loss Techniques

Overview of attention for article published in Current Gastroenterology Reports, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 600)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
84 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
73 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
video
9 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
563 Mendeley
Title
Popular Weight Loss Strategies: a Review of Four Weight Loss Techniques
Published in
Current Gastroenterology Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11894-017-0603-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Obert, Michelle Pearlman, Lois Obert, Sarah Chapin

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the epidemiology of obesity and the most recent literature on popular fad diets and exercise regimens that are used for weight loss. The weight loss plans that will be discussed in this article include juicing or detoxification diets, intermittent fasting, the paleo diet, and high intensity training. Despite the growing popularity of fad diets and exercise plans for weight loss, there are limited studies that actually suggest these particular regimens are beneficial and lead to long-term weight loss. Juicing or detoxification diets tend to work because they lead to extremely low caloric intake for short periods of time, however tend to lead to weight gain once a normal diet is resumed. Both intermittent fasting and the paleo diet lead to weight loss because of overall decreased caloric intake as well. Lastly, studies on short bursts of high intensity training have shown remarkable weight loss and improvements in cardiovascular health. Review of the literature does suggest that some fad diets and exercise plans do lead to weight loss; however, the studies are quite limited and are all based on the concept of caloric restriction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 563 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 563 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 136 24%
Student > Master 68 12%
Researcher 36 6%
Other 25 4%
Student > Postgraduate 24 4%
Other 91 16%
Unknown 183 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 98 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 15%
Sports and Recreations 44 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 5%
Other 75 13%
Unknown 198 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#28,222
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#533
of 343,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Gastroenterology Reports
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them