↓ Skip to main content

The splicing code

Overview of attention for article published in Biosystems, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The splicing code
Published in
Biosystems, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Baralle, Francisco Ernesto Baralle

Abstract

This issue dedicated to the code of life tackles very challenging and open questions in Biology. The genetic code, brilliantly uncovered over 50 years ago is an example of a univocal biological code. In fact, except for very few and marginal variations, it is the same from bacteria to man, the RNA stretch: 5' GUGUUC 3' reads as the dipeptide: Val-Phe in bacteria, in yeast, in Arabidopsis, in zebra fish, in mouse and in human. A degree of ambiguity is possible if mutations are introduced in the tRNAs in a way that the anticodon reads one amino acid but the aminoacyl-transferase attaches a different one onto the tRNA. These were the very useful suppressor genes that aided greatly the study of bacterial genetics. Other biological codes however, are more akin to social codes and are less amenable to an unambiguous deciphering. Legal and ethical codes, weather we like it or not, are flexible and depend on the structure and history of the society that has produced them, as well as a specific point in time. The codes that govern RNA splicing have similar characteristics. In fact, the splicing code depends on a myriad of different factors that in part are influenced by the background in which they are read such as different cells, tissues or developmental stages. Given the complexity of the splicing process, the construction of an algorithm that can define exons or their fate with certainty has not yet been achieved. However a substantial amount of information towards the deciphering of the splicing code has been gathered and in this manuscript we summarize the point reached.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Chemistry 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biosystems
#611
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,835
of 342,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosystems
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.