↓ Skip to main content

Student learning outcomes, perceptions and beliefs in the context of strengthening research integration into the first year of medical school

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Student learning outcomes, perceptions and beliefs in the context of strengthening research integration into the first year of medical school
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10459-017-9803-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mayke W. C. Vereijken, Roeland M. van der Rijst, Jan H. van Driel, Friedo W. Dekker

Abstract

Research integrated into undergraduate education is important in order for medical students to understand and value research for later clinical practice. Therefore, attempts are being made to strengthen the integration of research into teaching from the first year onwards. First-year students may interpret attempts made to strengthen research integration differently than intended by teachers. This might be explained by student beliefs about learning and research as well as student perceptions of the learning environment. In general, student perceptions of the learning environment play a pivotal role in fostering student learning outcomes. This study aims to determine whether a curriculum change intended to promote research integration fosters student learning outcomes and student perceptions of research integrated into teaching. To serve this purpose, three subsequent cohorts of first-year students were compared, one before and two after a curriculum change. Learning outcomes of these students were measured using scores on a national progress test of 921 students and assessments of a sample of 100 research reports of a first-year student research project. 746 Students filled out the Student Perceptions of Research Integration Questionnaire. The findings suggest that learning outcomes of these students, that is, scores on research related test items of the progress test and the quality of research reports, were better than those of students before the curriculum change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Lecturer 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 37 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Linguistics 4 4%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 37 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,827,358
of 24,151,461 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#101
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,199
of 331,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,151,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.