↓ Skip to main content

Catalase and ascorbate peroxidase—representative H2O2-detoxifying heme enzymes in plants

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
Catalase and ascorbate peroxidase—representative H2O2-detoxifying heme enzymes in plants
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-7309-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naser A. Anjum, Pallavi Sharma, Sarvajeet S. Gill, Mirza Hasanuzzaman, Ekhlaque A. Khan, Kiran Kachhap, Amal A. Mohamed, Palaniswamy Thangavel, Gurumayum Devmanjuri Devi, Palanisamy Vasudhevan, Adriano Sofo, Nafees A. Khan, Amarendra Narayan Misra, Alexander S. Lukatkin, Harminder Pal Singh, Eduarda Pereira, Narendra Tuteja

Abstract

Plants have to counteract unavoidable stress-caused anomalies such as oxidative stress to sustain their lives and serve heterotrophic organisms including humans. Among major enzymatic antioxidants, catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11) are representative heme enzymes meant for metabolizing stress-provoked reactive oxygen species (ROS; such as H2O2) and controlling their potential impacts on cellular metabolism and functions. CAT mainly occurs in peroxisomes and catalyzes the dismutation reaction without requiring any reductant; whereas, APX has a higher affinity for H2O2 and utilizes ascorbate (AsA) as specific electron donor for the reduction of H2O2 into H2O in organelles including chloroplasts, cytosol, mitochondria, and peroxisomes. Literature is extensive on the glutathione-associated H2O2-metabolizing systems in plants. However, discussion is meager or scattered in the literature available on the biochemical and genomic characterization as well as techniques for the assays of CAT and APX and their modulation in plants under abiotic stresses. This paper aims (a) to introduce oxidative stress-causative factors and highlights their relationship with abiotic stresses in plants; (b) to overview structure, occurrence, and significance of CAT and APX in plants;

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 72 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 12%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Chemistry 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 87 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#3,738
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,472
of 347,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#64
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.