↓ Skip to main content

Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications
Published in
European Spine Journal, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00586-014-3653-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bassel G. Diebo, Jensen Henry, Virginie Lafage, Pedro Berjano

Abstract

Degenerative changes have the potential to greatly disrupt the normal curvature of the spine, leading to sagittal malalignment. This phenomenon is often treated with operative modalities, such as osteotomies, though even with surgery, only one-third of patients may reach neutral alignment. Improvement in surgical outcomes may be achieved through better understanding of radiographic spino-pelvic parameters and their association with deformity. Methodical surgical planning, including selection of levels of instrumentation and site of the osteotomy, is crucial in determining the optimal plan for a patient's specific pathology and may minimize risk of developing postoperative proximal junctional kyphosis/failure. While sagittal alignment is essential in operative strategy, the coronal plane should not be overlooked, as it may affect the osteotomy technique. The concepts of sagittal balance and alignment are further complicated in patients with neuromuscular diseases such as Parkinson's disease, and appreciation of the interplay between anatomic and postural deformities is necessary to properly treat these patients. Finally, given the importance of sagittal alignment and the role of osteotomies in treatment for deformity, the need for future research becomes apparent. Novel intraoperative measurement techniques and three-dimensional analysis of the spine may allow for vastly improved operative correction. Furthermore, awareness of the relationship between alignment and balance, the soft tissue envelope, and compensatory mechanisms will provide a more comprehensive conception of the nature of spinal deformity and the modalities with which it is treated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Other 27 16%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 51%
Engineering 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 43 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,465
of 4,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,381
of 258,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#33
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.