↓ Skip to main content

Spathaspora piracicabensis f. a., sp. nov., a d-xylose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotting wood in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Spathaspora piracicabensis f. a., sp. nov., a d-xylose-fermenting yeast species isolated from rotting wood in Brazil
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10482-017-0974-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camila S. Varize, Raquel M. Cadete, Lucas D. Lopes, Renata M. Christofoleti-Furlan, Marc-André Lachance, Carlos A. Rosa, Luiz C. Basso

Abstract

Two strains of a novel yeast species were isolated from rotting wood of an ornamental tree (purple quaresmeira, Tibouchina granulosa, Melastomataceae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area in Brazil. Analysis of the sequences of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS-5.8S) region and the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit rRNA gene showed that this species belongs to the Spathaspora clade, and is phylogenetically related to Spathaspora brasiliensis, Candida materiae and Sp. girioi. The novel species ferments D-xylose, producing ethanol, with amounts between 3.37 and 3.48 g L(-1) ethanol from 2% D-xylose. Ascospores were not observed from this new species. The name Spathaspora piracicabensis f. a., sp. nov. is proposed to accommodate these isolates. The type strain is UFMG-CM-Y5867(T) (= CBS 15054(T) = ESALQ-I54(T)). The MycoBank number is MB 822,320.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,498,179
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,228
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,880
of 331,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#17
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.