↓ Skip to main content

Mechismo: predicting the mechanistic impact of mutations and modifications on molecular interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechismo: predicting the mechanistic impact of mutations and modifications on molecular interactions
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1093/nar/gku1094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J. Betts, Qianhao Lu, YingYing Jiang, Armin Drusko, Oliver Wichmann, Mathias Utz, Ilse A. Valtierra-Gutiérrez, Matthias Schlesner, Natalie Jaeger, David T. Jones, Stefan Pfister, Peter Lichter, Roland Eils, Reiner Siebert, Peer Bork, Gordana Apic, Anne-Claude Gavin, Robert B. Russell

Abstract

Systematic interrogation of mutation or protein modification data is important to identify sites with functional consequences and to deduce global consequences from large data sets. Mechismo (mechismo.russellab.org) enables simultaneous consideration of thousands of 3D structures and biomolecular interactions to predict rapidly mechanistic consequences for mutations and modifications. As useful functional information often only comes from homologous proteins, we benchmarked the accuracy of predictions as a function of protein/structure sequence similarity, which permits the use of relatively weak sequence similarities with an appropriate confidence measure. For protein-protein, protein-nucleic acid and a subset of protein-chemical interactions, we also developed and benchmarked a measure of whether modifications are likely to enhance or diminish the interactions, which can assist the detection of modifications with specific effects. Analysis of high-throughput sequencing data shows that the approach can identify interesting differences between cancers, and application to proteomics data finds potential mechanistic insights for how post-translational modifications can alter biomolecular interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
India 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 125 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 27%
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 31%
Computer Science 9 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#12,019
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,073
of 271,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#165
of 410 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 410 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.