↓ Skip to main content

Radon=Nikodymの定理をめぐつて

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Sugaku-Buturigakkwaishi, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radon=Nikodymの定理をめぐつて
Published in
Nippon Sugaku-Buturigakkwaishi, March 2010
DOI 10.11429/subutsukaishi1927.15.171
Authors

河田 敬義, 森田 紀一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#14,957,601
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Sugaku-Buturigakkwaishi
#9
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,096
of 103,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Sugaku-Buturigakkwaishi
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.