↓ Skip to main content

Fungal and Parasitic CNS Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Fungal and Parasitic CNS Infections
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12098-017-2487-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pratibha Singhi, Arushi Gahlot Saini

Abstract

Central nervous system fungal infections can be broadly divided into those that infect a healthy host such as Cryptococcus, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Sporothrix spp., and those that cause opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised host such as Candida, Aspergillus, Zygomycetes, Trichosporon spp. The clinical manifestations of central nervous system fungal infections commonly seen in children in clinical practice include a chronic meningitis or meningoencephalitis syndrome, brain abscess, rhino-cerebral syndrome and rarely, a fungal ventriculitis. Fungal central nervous system infections should be suspected in any child with subacute to chronic febrile encephalopathy or meningitis with or without raised intracranial pressure, seizures, orbital pain and/or sero-sanguinous nasal discharge. Diagnosis is corroborated by cerebrospinal fluid analysis, culture and PCR, special stains, serological tests and neuroimaging. Management of fungal central nervous system infections include specific antifungal therapy and supportive measures for associated problems, management of underlying predisposing condition and surgical intervention in cases with localized disease, abscess or presence of simultaneous foreign body such as intracranial shunts. In addition to the fungi, several parasitic infections can cause central nervous system infections in children. Of these, authors briefly discuss cerebral malaria, and amebic meningo-encephalitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Unspecified 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 35%
Unspecified 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1,127
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,391
of 326,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.