↓ Skip to main content

larvalign: Aligning Gene Expression Patterns from the Larval Brain of Drosophila melanogaster

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
larvalign: Aligning Gene Expression Patterns from the Larval Brain of Drosophila melanogaster
Published in
Neuroinformatics, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12021-017-9349-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sascha E. A. Muenzing, Martin Strauch, James W. Truman, Katja Bühler, Andreas S. Thum, Dorit Merhof

Abstract

The larval brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a small, tractable model system for neuroscience. Genes for fluorescent marker proteins can be expressed in defined, spatially restricted neuron populations. Here, we introduce the methods for 1) generating a standard template of the larval central nervous system (CNS), 2) spatial mapping of expression patterns from different larvae into a reference space defined by the standard template. We provide a manually annotated gold standard that serves for evaluation of the registration framework involved in template generation and mapping. A method for registration quality assessment enables the automatic detection of registration errors, and a semi-automatic registration method allows one to correct registrations, which is a prerequisite for a high-quality, curated database of expression patterns. All computational methods are available within the larvalign software package: https://github.com/larvalign/larvalign/releases/tag/v1.0.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Computer Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,325,363
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#111
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,020
of 339,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.