↓ Skip to main content

A Brazilian family with inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget’s disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia linked to the VCP pGly97Glu mutation

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A Brazilian family with inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget’s disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia linked to the VCP pGly97Glu mutation
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10067-017-3913-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Katsuyuki Shinjo, Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo, Antonio Marcondes Lerario, Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie

Abstract

The objective of this study is to report a Brazilian patient and his family with inclusion body myopathy associated with Paget's disease of bone and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD). A systematic review of the literature on the valosin-containing protein (VCP) mutation was also performed. The proband (patient) was initially treated as a case of possible refractory polymyositis with Paget's disease and later as an inclusion body myopathy. However, after admission to our service, and considering his personal and familial antecedents, whole exome sequencing was performed revealing valosin-containing protein (VCP) c.290G>A (p.Gly97Glu) mutation in the patient and his nine family members. The clinical presentation of the patient and his family was characterized by different degrees and evaluations of IBMPFD. According to the literature, only one family (Chinese) has this same VCP mutation concomitantly with different IBMPFD phenotype manifestations. The present study shows that IBMPFD should be considered as a differential diagnosis in patients with inflammatory myopathies associated to bone disease and/or cognitive impairment. Moreover, the study expands the genotypic spectrum of missense mutations of VCP gene in a Brazilian family with variable phenotypes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 17 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,991
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,664
of 3,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,068
of 328,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.