↓ Skip to main content

高速凝固採血管の検査値の評価―トロンビン添加による検査値への影響―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高速凝固採血管の検査値の評価―トロンビン添加による検査値への影響―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Medical Technology, March 2015
DOI 10.14932/jamt.14-63
Authors

石田 奈美, 佐藤 伊都子, 林 伸英, 三枝 淳, 河野 誠司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,526,423
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#62
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,946
of 271,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Medical Technology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.