You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The relative effectiveness of protected areas, a logging ban, and sacred areas for old-growth forest protection in southwest China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.043 |
| Authors |
Jodi S. Brandt, Van Butsic, Benjamin Schwab, Tobias Kuemmerle, Volker C. Radeloff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 154 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 65 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#729,337
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#618
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,167
of 359,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#10
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.