↓ Skip to main content

Treatment strategies and long-term outcomes for primary intramedullary spinal germinomas: an institutional experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Treatment strategies and long-term outcomes for primary intramedullary spinal germinomas: an institutional experience
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11060-014-1662-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Wu, Tao Yang, Xiaofeng Deng, Chenlong Yang, Jingyi Fang, Yulun Xu

Abstract

Primary intramedullary germinomas are very rare tumors in the spinal cord. This study presented a series of 11 patients with histologically proven primary intramedullary spinal germinomas. Their clinical and radiological findings, treatment records and long-term outcomes were reviewed. There were four male and seven female patients with a mean age of 27.1 years. Because germ cell tumors were suspected by frozen-section biopsy, gross total resection was unattempted. Partial resection was performed in four cases, while biopsy was performed in seven cases. Postoperatively, carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy combined with low dose radiotherapy (30.6 Gy) to local spine was performed in seven cases, followed by radiotherapy alone (40 Gy) in four cases. All 11 patients had a complete response to either combination treatment or single radiotherapy, and the mass effect on the spinal cord vanished. The mean follow-up period was 75.4 months. At the last follow-up, the symptoms were improved in 10 cases and the current status of one patient was unchanged. The postoperative follow-up magnetic resonance imaging showed no recurrence or dissemination in any of the patients. Primary intramedullary germinomas are amenable to adjuvant radiochemotherapy and low dose radiation with etoposide and carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended. When combination therapy cannot be performed, relatively high doses of radiotherapy are advised, and radiation to the craniospinal axis may be unnecessary. A good clinical outcome after combination therapy or radiotherapy alone can be expected, and the risk of long-term recurrence and dissemination is low.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 30%
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 80%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,231
of 2,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,174
of 262,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#20
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.