| Title |
Validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D and the KIDSCREEN-10 in children with ADHD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-013-0540-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clazien Bouwmans, Annemarie van der Kolk, Mark Oppe, Saskia Schawo, Elly Stolk, Michel van Agthoven, Jan Buitelaar, LeonaHakkaart van Roijen |
| Abstract |
The aim of our study is to compare the validity of a generic preference-based Quality of Life (QoL) instrument for adults to that of a generic child-specific QoL instrument in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 18 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#418
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,002
of 223,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.