↓ Skip to main content

Examples of DLR States Which are Not Weak Limits of Finite Volume Gibbs Measures with Deterministic Boundary Conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Examples of DLR States Which are Not Weak Limits of Finite Volume Gibbs Measures with Deterministic Boundary Conditions
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10955-015-1211-3
Authors

Loren Coquille

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#18,383,471
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#905
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,313
of 255,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.