↓ Skip to main content

Changes in species' distributions during and after environmental change: which eco‐evolutionary processes matter more?

Overview of attention for article published in Ecography, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in species' distributions during and after environmental change: which eco‐evolutionary processes matter more?
Published in
Ecography, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/ecog.01194
Authors

Calvin Dytham, Justin M. J. Travis, Karen Mustin, Tim G. Benton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 121 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 28%
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 61%
Environmental Science 24 18%
Mathematics 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,196,328
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#1,845
of 2,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,714
of 263,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#44
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.