↓ Skip to main content

Protein Kinase C in the Cerebellum: Its Significance and Remaining Conundrums

Overview of attention for article published in The Cerebellum, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Protein Kinase C in the Cerebellum: Its Significance and Remaining Conundrums
Published in
The Cerebellum, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12311-017-0898-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hirokazu Hirai

Abstract

Protein kinase C (PKC), a family of serine/threonine protein kinases, mediates a myriad of patho-physiological cellular events in various tissues. The originally discovered PKC (conventional) requires the binding of diacylglycerol and Ca(2+) for full activation. The conventional PKC consists of four isoforms, PKCα, PKCβI/βII, and PKCγ. PKCα and PKCβI/βII are expressed in the cells of various tissues including the brain, while PKCγ is present specifically in neurons of the brain and spinal cord. The cerebellum expresses the largest amount of PKC with all its four isoforms. Purkinje cells express PKCα and PKCγ. Previous studies have shown that PKCα is involved in the induction of long-term depression (LTD) at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. On the other hand, analysis of PKCγ-deficient mice has revealed that PKCγ plays a critical role in eliminating supernumerary climbing fiber synapses from developing Purkinje cells. Although why PKCα has no compensatory action in climbing fiber pruning in PKCγ-deficient Purkinje cells had so far remained unclear, we have recently demonstrated that PKCα is also capable of pruning supernumerary climbing fiber synapses, but the expression levels of PKCα are too low to achieve pruning in PKCγ-null Purkinje cells. Notably, although PKCγ is most abundant in Purkinje cells, its physiological role in mature Purkinje cells remained totally unknown. In addition to a concise review of the physiological and pathological roles of conventional PKCs in Purkinje cells, this report postulates a contribution of PKCα in developing Purkinje cells and a possible involvement of PKCγ in motor coordination in the mature cerebellum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#19,495,804
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from The Cerebellum
#659
of 957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,232
of 329,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Cerebellum
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 957 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.