↓ Skip to main content

Bright light therapy improves cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Bright light therapy improves cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11764-017-0659-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jillian A. Johnson, Sheila N. Garland, Linda E. Carlson, Josée Savard, J. Steven A. Simpson, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Tavis S. Campbell

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and distressing symptom that can persist after cancer treatment has concluded. Bright light therapy has shown preliminary efficacy in reducing CRF, but its impact on other psychosocial factors is unclear. The purpose was to examine the impact of a 1-month light therapy intervention on fatigue, mood, and quality of life in cancer survivors with fatigue. This 4-week blinded randomized controlled trial recruited cancer survivors who met diagnostic criteria for CRF. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a light therapy device that produced either bright white light (BWL; intervention) or dim red light (DRL; active control). Participants were instructed to use the device daily for 30 min upon waking for 28 days. The primary outcome, fatigue, was assessed weekly. Secondary outcomes assessed pre- and post-intervention included mood, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. A total of 81 participants were randomly assigned to receive BWL (n = 42) or DRL (n = 39). Analyses revealed a group-by-time interaction for fatigue (p = .034), wherein the BWL condition reported a 17% greater reduction in fatigue than those in the DRL condition (between group d = .30). There were also significant improvements over time for both groups on measures of mood, depressive symptoms, and quality of life (p's < .01). BWL was associated with greater improvements in fatigue and both groups displayed improvements on secondary psychosocial outcomes. These findings, along with previous reports of light therapy for CRF, support the use of this intervention to improve fatigue in cancer survivors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,485,682
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#90
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,279
of 328,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.