↓ Skip to main content

Does Nonsurgical Treatment Improve Longitudinal Outcomes of Lateral Epicondylitis Over No Treatment? A Meta‐analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
40 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
Does Nonsurgical Treatment Improve Longitudinal Outcomes of Lateral Epicondylitis Over No Treatment? A Meta‐analysis
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-4022-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eli T. Sayegh, Robert J. Strauch

Abstract

Lateral epicondylitis is a painful tendinopathy for which several nonsurgical treatment strategies are used. Superiority of these nonsurgical treatments over nontreatment has not been definitively established.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Researcher 27 10%
Other 26 10%
Student > Master 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 61 23%
Unknown 56 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 14%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 63 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,203,485
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#127
of 7,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,299
of 275,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.