↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Experimental investigation of Görtler vortices in hypersonic ramp flows

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Experimental investigation of Görtler vortices in hypersonic ramp flows
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00348-017-2448-1
Authors

Amit Roghelia, Herbert Olivier, Ivan Egorov, Pavel Chuvakhov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,483,026
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#529
of 1,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,043
of 325,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.