↓ Skip to main content

The hydrological legacy of deforestation on global wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
102 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The hydrological legacy of deforestation on global wetlands
Published in
Science, November 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1260510
Pubmed ID
Authors

C Woodward, J Shulmeister, J Larsen, G E Jacobsen, A Zawadzki

Abstract

Increased catchment erosion and nutrient loading are commonly recognized impacts of deforestation on global wetlands. In contrast, an increase in water availability in deforested catchments is well known in modern studies but is rarely considered when evaluating past human impacts. We used a Budyko water balance approach, a meta-analysis of global wetland response to deforestation, and paleoecological studies from Australasia to explore this issue. After complete deforestation, we demonstrated that water available to wetlands increases by up to 15% of annual precipitation. This can convert ephemeral swamps to permanent lakes or even create new wetlands. This effect is globally significant, with 9 to 12% of wetlands affected, including 20 to 40% of Ramsar wetlands, but is widely unrecognized because human impact studies rarely test for it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 180 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 26 14%
Professor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 73 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 14%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 32 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#428,112
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Science
#10,722
of 83,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,344
of 270,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#138
of 817 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 817 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.