↓ Skip to main content

Cortical Processing of Level Cues for Spatial Hearing is Impaired in Children with Prelingual Deafness Despite Early Bilateral Access to Sound

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Cortical Processing of Level Cues for Spatial Hearing is Impaired in Children with Prelingual Deafness Despite Early Bilateral Access to Sound
Published in
Brain Topography, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10548-017-0596-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Michael Deighton, Blake Papsin, Karen Gordon

Abstract

Bilateral cochlear implantation aims to restore binaural hearing, important for spatial hearing, to children who are deaf. Improvements over unilateral implant use are attributed largely to the detection of interaural level differences (ILDs) but emerging evidence of impaired sound localization and binaural fusion suggest that these binaural cues are abnormally coded by the auditory system. We used multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) to assess cortical responses to ILDs in two groups: 13 children who received early bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) simultaneously, known to protect the developing auditory cortices from unilaterally driven reorganization, and 15 age matched peers with normal hearing. EEG source analyses indicated a dominance of right auditory cortex in both groups. Expected reductions in activity to ipsilaterally weighted ILDs were evident in the right hemisphere of children with normal hearing. By contrast, cortical activity in children with CIs showed: (1) limited ILD sensitivity in either cortical hemisphere, (2) limited correlation with reliable behavioral right-left lateralization of ILDs (in 10/12 CI users), and (3) deficits in parieto-occipital areas and the cerebellum. Thus, expected cortical ILD coding develops with normal hearing but is affected by developmental deafness despite early and simultaneous bilateral implantation. Findings suggest that impoverished fidelity of ILDs in independently functioning CIs may be impeding development of cortical ILD sensitivity in children who are deaf but do not altogether limit benefits of listening with bilateral CIs. Future efforts to provide consistent/accurate ILDs through auditory prostheses including CIs could improve binaural hearing for children with hearing loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 7 15%
Unspecified 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Unspecified 5 11%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2017.
All research outputs
#18,576,001
of 23,007,887 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#356
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,963
of 331,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.