↓ Skip to main content

The toxic effect of R350P mutant desmin in striated muscle of man and mouse

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
The toxic effect of R350P mutant desmin in striated muscle of man and mouse
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, November 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1363-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph S. Clemen, Florian Stöckigt, Karl-Heinz Strucksberg, Frederic Chevessier, Lilli Winter, Johanna Schütz, Ralf Bauer, José-Manuel Thorweihe, Daniela Wenzel, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Volker Rasche, Pavle Krsmanovic, Hugo A. Katus, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Steffen Just, Oliver J. Müller, Oliver Friedrich, Rainer Meyer, Harald Herrmann, Jan Wilko Schrickel, Rolf Schröder

Abstract

Mutations of the human desmin gene on chromosome 2q35 cause autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive and sporadic forms of protein aggregation myopathies and cardiomyopathies. We generated R349P desmin knock-in mice, which harbor the ortholog of the most frequently occurring human desmin missense mutation R350P. These mice develop age-dependent desmin-positive protein aggregation pathology, skeletal muscle weakness, dilated cardiomyopathy, as well as cardiac arrhythmias and conduction defects. For the first time, we report the expression level and subcellular distribution of mutant versus wild-type desmin in our mouse model as well as in skeletal muscle specimens derived from human R350P desminopathies. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the missense-mutant desmin inflicts changes of the subcellular localization and turnover of desmin itself and of direct desmin-binding partners. Our findings unveil a novel principle of pathogenesis, in which not the presence of protein aggregates, but disruption of the extrasarcomeric intermediate filament network leads to increased mechanical vulnerability of muscle fibers. These structural defects elicited at the myofiber level finally impact the entire organ and subsequently cause myopathy and cardiomyopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Psychology 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,275
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,365
of 258,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#25
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.