↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a “normal” sample of young men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a “normal” sample of young men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01541940
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terrel L. Templeman, Ray D. Stinnett

Abstract

Sexual histories and arousal patterns of 60 college men were sampled in a rural area to better evaluate the role of sexual arousal in males typically used as nonoffender controls in sex research. Nearly two-thirds of the sample (65%) had engaged in some form of sexual misconduct in the past, ranging from sexual contacts with children and coercive sex with women to voyeurism and frottage. Even more subjects expressed a desire for such activities. Previous experience with frottage, obscene phone calls, and pedophilic contacts was associated with higher subjective arousal to depictions of these activities. Previous experience with coercive sex or voyeurism did not appear to be associated with greater arousal to these activities. There was considerable variability in the arousability of subjects to the variety of deviant stimuli presented, thus blurring the distinction between pathological and normal arousal patterns. These results suggest that young men are easily aroused sexually by a variety of stimuli, and seek out a variety of sexual experiences, some of which are punishable by law.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#843,888
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#428
of 3,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118
of 18,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them