| Title |
Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: An alternative Sugar Replacer and Its Application in Food Industry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food Engineering Reviews, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12393-014-9080-0 |
| Authors |
Mohammed Abdalbasit A. Gasmalla, Ruijin Yang, Xiao Hua |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 58 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 11% |
| Engineering | 15 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 71 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,167,468
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Food Engineering Reviews
#8
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,393
of 228,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Engineering Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them