Title |
Breast cancer risk in relation to abortion: Results from the EPIC study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Cancer, July 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/ijc.22001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gillian K. Reeves, Sau‐Wan Kan, Tim Key, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kim Overvad, Petra H. Peeters, Françoise Clavel‐Chapelon, Xavier Paoletti, Franco Berrino, Vittorio Krogh, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Salvatore Panico, Paulo Vineis, Carlos A. Gonzalez, Eva Ardanaz, Carmen Martinez, Pilar Amiano, José R. Quiros, Maria R. Tormo, Kay‐Tee Khaw, Antonia Trichopoulou, Theodora Psaltopoulou, Victoria Kalapothaki, Gabriele Nagel, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Heiner Boeing, Petra H. Lahmann, Elisabet Wirfält, Rudolf Kaaks, Elio Riboli |
Abstract |
The role of spontaneous and induced abortion on breast cancer risk is examined among 267,361 women recruited into the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition between 1992 and 2000. The data were collected from 20 centers, across 9 countries, and included information on a total of 4,805 women with breast cancer, of whom 1,657 reported having ever had any type of abortion. Overall, the relative risk of breast cancer in women who reported ever having had a spontaneous abortion was not significantly elevated when compared with women who reported never having had such an abortion (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.99-1.14). However, there was some evidence of a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer among women who reported having had 2 or more spontaneous abortions (1.20, 1.07-1.35). The relative risk of breast cancer among women who reported ever having had an induced abortion when compared to women who reported never having had an induced abortion was 0.95 (0.87-1.03). Overall, the findings provide further unbiased evidence of the lack of an adverse effect of induced abortion on breast cancer risk. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
El Salvador | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 4% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 19% |
Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 32% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 32% |