↓ Skip to main content

2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults A Report of the American College of…

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 16,760)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3780 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2717 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
Published in
JACC, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul K Whelton, Robert M Carey, Wilbert S Aronow, Donald E Casey, Karen J Collins, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Sondra M DePalma, Samuel Gidding, Kenneth A Jamerson, Daniel W Jones, Eric J MacLaughlin, Paul Muntner, Bruce Ovbiagele, Sidney C Smith, Crystal C Spencer, Randall S Stafford, Sandra J Taler, Randal J Thomas, Kim A Williams, Jeff D Williamson, Jackson T Wright

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 247 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,717 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2717 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 358 13%
Student > Master 239 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 192 7%
Researcher 171 6%
Other 142 5%
Other 432 16%
Unknown 1183 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 637 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 263 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 174 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 2%
Social Sciences 41 2%
Other 273 10%
Unknown 1262 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1016. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,863
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#42
of 16,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247
of 337,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#3
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.