↓ Skip to main content

A convex dual approach to the computation of NMR complex spectra

Overview of attention for article published in Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 124)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A convex dual approach to the computation of NMR complex spectra
Published in
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, February 2000
DOI 10.1007/s001860050004
Authors

Jonathan M. Borwein, Pierre Maréchal, David Naugler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Mathematical Methods of Operations Research
#8
of 124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,719
of 111,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematical Methods of Operations Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them