↓ Skip to main content

Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Obesity, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
164 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
455 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing
Published in
International Journal of Obesity, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/ijo.2014.199
Pubmed ID
Authors

N V Dhurandhar, D Schoeller, A W Brown, S B Heymsfield, D Thomas, T I A Sørensen, J R Speakman, M Jeansonne, D B Allison

Abstract

Energy intake (EI) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) are key modifiable determinants of energy balance, traditionally assessed by self-report despite its repeated demonstration of considerable inaccuracies. We argue here that it is time to move from the common view that self-reports of EI and PAEE are imperfect, but nevertheless deserving of use, to a view commensurate with the evidence that self-reports of EI and PAEE are so poor that they are wholly unacceptable for scientific research on EI and PAEE. While new strategies for objectively determining energy balance are in their infancy, it is unacceptable to use decidedly inaccurate instruments, which may misguide health-care policies, future research and clinical judgment. The scientific and medical communities should discontinue reliance on self-reported EI and PAEE. Researchers and sponsors should develop objective measures of energy balance.International Journal of Obesity advance online publication, 23 December 2014; doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.199.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 381 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 19%
Researcher 63 16%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Other 25 6%
Other 91 23%
Unknown 59 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 13%
Sports and Recreations 44 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 6%
Other 92 23%
Unknown 78 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#174,662
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Obesity
#98
of 4,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,567
of 274,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Obesity
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.